Services
Each entry states the work, why people pay for it, and who usually signs. Start with whatever is costing you most right now — not with the largest item.
Systems shaped around how you work — on web, phone, and desktop.
An inexpensive first step, to confirm the problem before committing real money.
2 weeks$4,000
The code the previous vendor left behind is dissected and run, producing two costed options: continue, or rewrite specific parts.
Why people pay for it
The code does not run, nobody understands it, there is no documentation, and the deadline has passed.
2 weeksFee credited in full if you continue to a build contract
Two weeks to lock the specification, architecture, release order, and final numbers — before a line of code is written.
Why people pay for it
Every vendor quotes a wildly different number and none can explain why.
60 minutesFree
A one-hour meeting to map the problem, the available options, and a rough sense of cost and time.
Why people pay for it
You know something is wrong but cannot yet phrase it as a request anyone can price.
2 days$1,200
Two days with your team turning "we need a system" into something estimable: who uses it, what must happen, what is deliberately excluded, and what it will roughly cost.
Why people pay for it
About 39% of projects start from unclear requirements and 78% suffer scope creep. Both begin in the same place: an opening agreement loose enough that each side pictures something different — and the difference only surfaces once half the budget is gone.
The scope can be pinned down, so we publish the number along with its ceiling.
4–5 weeks$9,000
An app for technicians, field sales, or couriers working where there is no signal — reports sync once back in range.
Why people pay for it
Field reports are written on paper then retyped at the office, and proof of visit regularly goes missing on the way.
4 weeks$7,800
A point-of-sale application that keeps its own data locally and catches up with head office once the network returns.
Why people pay for it
The internet drops, the till stops, the queue walks out, and that hour’s sales are simply gone.
1–2 weeks$2,100/connection
Two systems that never spoke are made to exchange data automatically, with nobody copying in between.
Why people pay for it
Someone’s job is copying data from one application into another all day — and occasionally getting it wrong.
3 weeks$5,200
Figures from three separate data sources merged into one screen every division agrees on.
Why people pay for it
Finance, sales, and operations bring different figures to the same meeting, and the meeting is spent arguing over which is right.
2–3 weeks$3,200
A company website with an admin panel, so text, images, and pages can be changed without calling a developer.
Why people pay for it
Changing a single sentence means going through the vendor, waiting days, and being billed each time.
2–3 weeks$3,800
A full read of a running system: code quality, unmaintained dependencies, security gaps, running costs, and which parts are genuinely dangerous to touch.
Why people pay for it
Your system runs, but nobody dares change it. The original developers left, there is no documentation, and every small request is answered with "possible, but risky". You do not know whether to repair or replace — and guessing wrong here costs years.
6–8 weeks$13,000
An Android and iPhone app from a single codebase, supported until it clears App Store and Play Store review.
Why people pay for it
Customers keep asking for an app, but every quote doubles because Android and iPhone are counted separately.
3–6 weeks per connection$4,200/connection
Connecting systems never designed to talk — accounting, warehouse, payments, logistics, government portals — with safe failure handling and retries.
Why people pay for it
The same data is retyped in three places every day. It is not just wasted hours: each retype is a chance to be wrong, and the error only surfaces at the close of books.
4–6 weeks$5,600
Bringing numbers from separate systems into one view you can trust — with each figure’s definition written down, so meetings stop arguing over whose version is right.
Why people pay for it
Each department arrives with a different number for the same thing, and half the meeting goes to deciding whose is right. The actual decision gets made in the final minutes, on a basis nobody agreed on.
Scope is established first through diagnosis. Quoting before that guarantees one side loses.
3–12 months
The old system is replaced piece by piece while still running, until the last part has moved.
Why people pay for it
The original vendor is long gone, there is no documentation, and one small change now takes weeks.
10–20 weeks
A product that bills for itself: multi-tenant, tiered plans, quotas, and recurring billing that runs unattended.
Why people pay for it
Money already burnt on features nobody uses, a rotating cast of vendors, and billing still done by hand every month.
12–24 weeks
A complete subscription platform: tenant data separation, plans and quotas, billing, an admin panel, and audit trails — with separation that is tested rather than assumed.
Why people pay for it
You have proven people will pay, but the current version cannot hold a second tenant without being copied wholesale. Every new customer adds another copy to maintain — and growth stops for reasons that have nothing to do with demand.
6–16 weeks
An internal tool, customer portal, or operations console shaped around how you work, not the other way round.
Why people pay for it
Off-the-shelf software forces the team to change how it works, and the part that matters most simply is not there.
2-week assessment, then staged
Taking over a stalled project: establishing what is genuinely finished, what can be salvaged, and the shortest path to something usable.
Why people pay for it
Only 29.7% of software projects land on time, on budget, and at quality. You are in the other 70%: the budget is spent, deadlines have slipped repeatedly, and vendor progress reports no longer match anything you can open and use.
4–12 months, in stages
Moving a legacy system piece by piece while the old one keeps running — rather than rewriting everything and hoping the switchover survives one weekend.
Why people pay for it
A big-bang rewrite is the most reliably failing shape of project — modernisation typically overruns by 150%. Throughout the rewrite the old system still needs maintaining, so you pay twice for one system.
10–18 weeks
Android and iOS from one codebase, with offline mode where fieldwork demands it, and a release path that does not wait on a vendor.
Why people pay for it
Your field staff record on paper and enter it in the evening — when they get to it. The data is always a day late, and today’s decisions run on yesterday’s picture.
8–20 weeks
Inventory, orders, payroll, and approval flows in one connected system.
Why people pay for it
Recorded stock never matches the warehouse, and approvals stall on whoever is on leave.
12–24 weeks
A platform matching two sides, holding funds until the deal completes, then settling payment and ratings.
Why people pay for it
Both sides are afraid to hand over money or goods first, so the deal never happens.
8–20 weeks
A system that follows how you actually work — rather than a way of working you must change to fit software bought off the shelf.
Why people pay for it
Your core operation runs on spreadsheets copied between people, chat groups, and a few individuals’ memories. Everyone who leaves takes part of the method with them, and nobody knows the real numbers until month end.
For systems already live that need someone accountable.
Monthly
Fixes, security updates, monitoring, and further development with a written response time.
Why people pay for it
The system is live but nobody is responsible when it breaks on a Saturday.
Ongoing$2,800/month
Technical leadership present a few days a month: judging vendor proposals, blocking decisions that get expensive later, and translating technical matters into business decisions.
Why people pay for it
You are making large technical decisions with nobody technical on your side of the table. Judging vendor proposals ends up relying on the vendors themselves — and weak project management is behind 47% of software project failures.
Digital assets anyone can audit, at any time.
An inexpensive first step, to confirm the problem before committing real money.
2 weeksFee credited in full if you continue to a development contract
Two weeks to lock the token structure, holder rights, jurisdiction map, and technical specification — before code is written.
Why people pay for it
Three questions remain unanswered — what exactly is being sold, what holders concretely get, and which jurisdiction is targeted — and without them any number is a guess.
The scope can be pinned down, so we publish the number along with its ceiling.
2 weeks$5,000
A layered security review with reproducible attack paths, plus one retest after fixes.
Why people pay for it
Without an audit report, no exchange and no investor will continue the conversation.
3 weeks$6,300
Diplomas, quality certificates, and export documents whose authenticity anyone can verify in seconds.
Why people pay for it
Documents are trivially forged, and verifying one with its issuer takes days.
3–4 weeks$9,500
A larger scope with per-dimension review: arithmetic, access control, external calls, price feeds, and economic resilience.
Why people pay for it
Once published it cannot be recalled — and most crypto incidents come from contracts already running.
2–3 weeks$4,800
Setting who holds what, how many signatures each class of action needs, how keys rotate when someone leaves, and what happens if one holder is lost.
Why people pay for it
This is where three quarters of 2026 DeFi losses actually happened — not in the contracts. One key held by one person, or a multisig whose threshold its own holders can lower, makes the entire contract audit irrelevant.
2–4 weeks$5,200
Wiring price sources with fallbacks, time-weighted averaging, and movement bounds — so one briefly manipulated price cannot drain the protocol.
Why people pay for it
A protocol reading price from a single pool can be drained in one transaction: move the price briefly, borrow against the false number, then move it back. The contract runs exactly as written.
Scope is established first through diagnosis. Quoting before that guarantees one side loses.
6–10 weeks
Time-locked deposits, scheduled distributions, and brakes that stop the value being dumped all at once.
Why people pay for it
A carelessly designed yield programme accelerates the collapse it was meant to prevent — holders withdraw everything on day one.
8–14 weeks
Intermediary-free asset swapping and collateralised lending, with monitoring and a collateral-recovery mechanism.
Why people pay for it
The issued asset cannot be sold anywhere, so nobody wants to hold it in the first place.
4–12 weeks
A four-layer platform — asset, verification, token, and application — built compliance-ready from the start, with an investor portal and issuer console.
Why people pay for it
Investors do not believe an asset exists because you say so; they demand evidence they can check themselves, and without it the raise stalls at the conversation stage.
8–14 weeks
Liquidity pools, swap routing, fee logic, and an interface an ordinary person can use — plus an admin panel to change fees without touching code.
Why people pay for it
Your token can only be traded on someone else’s venue, at fees they set, under rules they can change. Every trade strengthens their platform, not yours.
4–8 weeks
Identity checks, rules on who may hold and transfer, screening, and periodic reporting — per jurisdiction.
Why people pay for it
One new country’s rules means rebuilding from scratch, because compliance was never designed in.
8–12 weeks
On- and off-ramps plus cross-border settlement that completes in minutes rather than days.
Why people pay for it
Transfer fees are heavy and money sits in transit for days, against a thin margin.
10–16 weeks
Isolated per-asset markets, collateral thresholds, a liquidation engine, and interest curves — with risk separated so one collapsing asset cannot drag the whole protocol down.
Why people pay for it
The assets your community holds sit idle. They want to borrow without selling, but using someone else’s protocol hands over the fees, the liquidation rules, and the systemic risk to a party you do not control.
Diagnosis first
Handling the aftermath of an exploit or a needed upgrade: recovering remaining funds, patching, and migration.
Why people pay for it
The contract has been exploited, what remains is still inside, and every passing hour risks losing the rest.
3–4 weeks
Reviewing the layer a contract audit does not touch: who holds the keys, who can change parameters, how deployments happen, where prices come from, and whether abuse would be visible before the money is gone.
Why people pay for it
In the first half of 2026, 76.7% of all funds lost in DeFi were taken from protocols that had been audited — and in 94.4% of those cases the contracts ran exactly as written. What failed were the keys, the permissions, and the process. An audit certificate never examined any of that.
10–16 weeks
Issuing fractional ownership of a physical asset or receivable: issuance contracts, evidence storage, distribution rails, and transfer restrictions where required.
Why people pay for it
Your asset is valuable but indivisible, so the buyer pool is limited to the few who can take all of it. Capital stays locked for years while the funding need is now.
2–5 weeksScope follows line count and how contracts interact; market rates run from thousands to six figures. We quote after reading the code.
Line-by-line review by several auditors working from different angles, plus invariant and fuzz testing — not a scanner run pasted into a report template.
Why people pay for it
Once deployed, a contract cannot be recalled. Exchanges want an audit report before listing, investors before releasing funds, institutional partners before integrating. Without it, the money does not move.
6–10 weeks
Funds locked in a contract and released per milestone when both sides agree, with a dispute route for when they do not.
Why people pay for it
In cross-border work or between parties who do not know each other, someone must pay first — and that side carries all the risk. Reasonable deals fall apart simply because nobody wants to go first.
2–3 weeks
Testing whether the economic design holds under pressure: where the yield is actually paid from, what happens if the price halves, and who benefits most if everyone exits at once.
Why people pay for it
The contracts can be technically flawless and still collapse economically. Yield paid from the next depositor always stops — the only questions are when, and who is still holding when it does.
6–10 weeks
Allocation design, vesting contracts, a claim portal for holders, and an issuer panel — so the promised schedule is enforced by code rather than promised in a document.
Why people pay for it
An unlock schedule that lives only in a document binds nobody. Early holders know it, and that uncertainty shows up in the price from day one.
Immediate, then 2–6 weeks
Stopping the bleeding, establishing what happened, securing what remains, and building a recovery path that can be explained to holders.
Why people pay for it
The protocol is being drained and nobody knows through where. Every minute adds to the loss, the community demands answers in public, and decisions made in panic usually make it worse.
For systems already live that need someone accountable.
Monthly$1,100/month
Watching a live contract: alerts on unusual behaviour, and an emergency pause switch ready to use.
Why people pay for it
The contract already holds real funds, but nobody is watching it outside office hours.
Annual
Maintenance, infrastructure, data providers, and compliance updates for a platform already running.
Why people pay for it
Second-year costs are never budgeted at the start, then arrive as a surprise that wrecks the budget.
Ongoing$2,200/month
Continuous watch over protocol invariants: solvency, unusual movement, privileged calls, and parameter changes — alerting the person who can act, not a dashboard nobody watches.
Why people pay for it
Most exploits unfold in stages, leaving early minutes when the loss can still be stopped. Without monitoring that wakes someone up, those minutes pass and all that is left is counting the loss.
Repetitive work handed to machines, and finished.
An inexpensive first step, to confirm the problem before committing real money.
1 week$2,500
A diagnosis of why an AI experiment stopped short of use, what can be salvaged, and what continuing costs.
Why people pay for it
The budget is spent and the demo looked good, but to this day no team uses it daily.
1–2 weeks
A ranked list of processes: how many working hours can genuinely be saved, set against the cost of building it.
Why people pay for it
Everyone advises "use AI", but nobody can point to which part actually saves money.
The scope can be pinned down, so we publish the number along with its ceiling.
2–3 weeks$4,800
Invoices, forms, and ID cards read and entered without retyping; anything doubtful goes to a person.
Why people pay for it
Thousands of invoices retyped every month, and one typo becomes a reconciliation gap hunted for days.
3 weeks$5,500
An assistant answering from your own documents on WhatsApp, web, and email — handing over to a person when unsure.
Why people pay for it
The reply arrives two hours later, the customer has already moved to a competitor, and the night-shift cost keeps running.
2–3 weeks$4,600
Where staff ask about company policy, procedures, and internal data — answered from official documents, with sources.
Why people pay for it
The same question goes to the same person over and over, and the answer differs depending on who is asked.
2 weeks$3,900
Requests route themselves to the right person, with a stand-in when that person is away.
Why people pay for it
A request sits on the desk of someone on leave, and nobody knows where the paperwork is now.
1–2 weeks$3,000
Meetings and calls become a summary plus an action list stating who does what.
Why people pay for it
The meeting ends, everyone feels aligned, and a week later nobody remembers who owns what.
Scope is established first through diagnosis. Quoting before that guarantees one side loses.
6–10 weeks
Credit risk scoring, churn likelihood, and demand forecasting — from the data you already hold.
Why people pay for it
Important decisions still rest on gut feel, while years of data sit unused.
6–12 weeks
An agent that reads context, decides within written limits of authority, completes multi-step work, and hands over when unsure.
Why people pay for it
Multi-step work still needs a person watching every step, so the promised saving never materialises.
6–12 weeks
A machine-executed trading strategy with written risk limits, tested against historical data before touching real funds.
Why people pay for it
A strategy profitable on paper fails when executed by hand — because people are late, hesitant, or asleep.
8–16 weeks
The same capability, running on your own servers, with no data leaving that environment.
Why people pay for it
The need is clear, but the data may not leave the company — let alone the country.
For systems already live that need someone accountable.
Grow plan$899/month
Raw client documents gathered, ordered by date, the facts summarised, and handed over as a file ready for a lawyer to read.
Why people pay for it
The most expensive lawyer in your firm spends the morning sorting a client’s email attachments into date order.
Grow plan$899/month
Incoming tickets are read, ordered by real risk, answered where the answer exists, and escalated to a person where it does not.
Why people pay for it
Your angriest customer waits the longest, because their ticket arrived at the bottom and nobody reads the whole queue.
Monthly
Cost-per-use monitoring, a fallback provider when one goes down, usage limits, and periodic quality checks.
Why people pay for it
The bill balloons with nobody knowing which part caused it, and when the provider goes down the service goes with it.
Grow plan$899/month
Low stock, competitor pricing, broken product pages, and supplier emails watched daily, then condensed into a morning action list.
Why people pay for it
Your best-selling product was out of stock for four days before anyone noticed, and the ads kept running the whole time.
Grow plan$899/month
Each week, a list of buyers who genuinely fit what you sell — researched, each with a reason they are being contacted now, and the first message already drafted.
Why people pay for it
Your prospect list came from somewhere unverified, half of them have changed jobs, and the same message goes to all of them. The only replies are people telling you they are the wrong target.
Grow plan$899/month
Incoming sponsor offers screened, judged for fit, answered, and tracked through to delivery and payment.
Why people pay for it
There is a five-figure sponsorship offer in your inbox from six weeks ago that was never answered.
Scale plan$2,499/month
Three to five of your core workflows built, wired into the tools you already use, and handed over running — not handed over as a tool to learn.
Why people pay for it
You bought an automation tool last year. The subscription is still running and not one workflow is actually in use.
Grow plan$899/month
Conversations, meeting notes, and missed deadlines are watched for the signs a client is drifting — before they send the cancellation email.
Why people pay for it
Your best client left last month, and on re-reading, the signs were there six weeks earlier. Nobody was watching.
Scale plan$2,499/month
Market information gathered, patterns summarised, and a decision memo assembled — in hours rather than weeks.
Why people pay for it
Good deals pass you by because the research takes two weeks and the seller will not wait that long.
Start plan$299/month
The questions that genuinely come in are collected, answered in writing a non-expert can follow, then assembled into a help centre that keeps updating.
Why people pay for it
Your help centre was written two years ago by someone who has left, and half of it is no longer true. Customers stopped opening it.
Grow plan$899/month
Incoming enquiries answered, scheduled to the nearest technician, reminded to the customer, and followed up once the job is done.
Why people pay for it
The phone rings while the technician is on a roof and the owner is driving. The customer calls the competitor who picks up.
Grow plan$899/month
Incoming replies are read, sorted between interested and not, basic objections answered, and whoever is ready is booked straight into your sales team’s calendar.
Why people pay for it
Forty replies are stacked in the inbox. Some are interested, nobody has time to sort them, and three days later the interested ones have gone cold.
Grow plan$899/month
Publishing schedules, repurposing older work, comment handling, and reporting — so your time returns to making the work.
Why people pay for it
You became a creator to make things, and now six hours a week go to uploading, clipping, and replying.
Scale plan$2,499/month
Today’s priorities set, meeting prep prepared, follow-ups chased, and the small things that always slip reminded at the right moment.
Why people pay for it
You run a company and forgot to answer an email that could be worth six figures, because it sank beneath forty others.
Scale plan$2,499/month
Client onboarding, weekly reports, quality checks, and internal status updates all run without waiting for the owner to find time.
Why people pay for it
You cannot leave your agency for a single week. Every onboarding, every report, every check ends up going through you — and that is what caps its growth.
Scale plan$2,499/month
Tender opportunities watched, requirements summarised, compliance checked point by point, and a completeness checklist built before the deadline.
Why people pay for it
You skip tenders worth hundreds of thousands because the paperwork takes two weeks and your team is busy delivering.
Start plan$299/month
Every complaint, compliment, and request across tickets, reviews, and conversations gathered into one monthly report naming what is complained about most.
Why people pay for it
Everyone in the company has an opinion about what customers complain about, and not one of them can show the data.
Grow plan$899/month
Listings watched, neighbourhoods compared, and a deal summary built automatically the moment something matches your criteria.
Why people pay for it
The property you wanted appeared on Tuesday and sold on Thursday. You saw it on Friday.
Grow plan$899/month
Your thinking — from a voice note, a quick message, or a meeting recording — turned into publishable posts for LinkedIn, X, and your newsletter, in your own voice.
Why people pay for it
You know content brings in your best clients, and you have plenty to say. Yet nothing has gone out in three months.
Grow plan$899/month
Participants enrolled, materials delivered on schedule, assignments reminded, repeat questions answered, and stragglers contacted.
Why people pay for it
You teach for two hours a week and administer it for ten — and that is why you have not opened the next cohort.
Grow plan$899/month
Applications summarised, matched against the role requirements, strong candidates flagged, and outreach drafted — so good candidates do not wait two weeks.
Why people pay for it
Your strongest applicant accepted an offer elsewhere before their application was even read.
Grow plan$899/month
Each client gets their own page showing recent work, the agreed figures, and the status of everything — updating itself, open whenever they want.
Why people pay for it
Every month-end, two days of your team’s time goes into reports a client may open for three minutes.
Grow plan$899/month
The evidence auditors will ask for is collected all year, arranged in the order they check it, and gaps flagged early.
Why people pay for it
Three weeks before the auditor arrives, the whole team stops working to hunt for evidence from a year ago.
Grow plan$899/month
Customer requests, competitor moves, and recurring complaints assembled into the material for deciding what gets built next.
Why people pay for it
Your roadmap is decided by whoever spoke loudest in the last meeting, not by what customers actually ask for most.
Start plan$299/month
Happy customers asked for a review at the right moment, new reviews answered quickly, and bad ones handled before they spread.
Why people pay for it
The competitor across the road has 240 reviews and you have nine — even though your customers are happier.
Scale plan$2,499/month
Customer records cleaned, calls summarised, stalled deals surfaced, and a daily action list sent to each salesperson.
Why people pay for it
You have a sales team, yet deals worth tens of thousands sit untouched for weeks with nobody noticing — and the records are too messy to tell anyone.
Grow plan$899/month
New members onboarded, repeat questions answered, quiet members contacted, and renewals reminded before they lapse.
Why people pay for it
Members who leave almost always leave quietly — they had opened nothing for six weeks before the subscription lapsed.
Start plan$299/month
Invoices, receipts, and supplier emails collected, categorised, matched, and handed to the accountant already tidy.
Why people pay for it
Your accountant bills extra every quarter because what arrives is photos of receipts on WhatsApp and unopened emails.
Scale plan$2,499/month
The way you work — currently living in your head — is written down as procedure, then turned into automated onboarding, dashboards, and repeatable sales material.
Why people pay for it
Every client is done differently because they are all "special cases". So you cannot hire, cannot raise prices, and cannot stop.
Grow plan$899/month
Claim files checked for completeness, missing items requested from the applicant, and complete ones forwarded — so claims are not rejected over paperwork.
Why people pay for it
Most rejected claims are not invalid — one document was missing and nobody had time to chase it.
Start plan$299/month
Messages arriving by WhatsApp, email, and web form are read, sorted between buyers, complaints, and offers, then answered or routed to the right person.
Why people pay for it
A buyer messages on Saturday afternoon. You read it Monday morning, among forty others, and they have already bought elsewhere.
Grow plan$899/month
Every deal that ever came in and never closed is re-read, judged for whether it is still alive, then revived with a reason that is relevant today.
Why people pay for it
There are hundreds of names in your records that nearly closed and then vanished. Nobody dares touch them because nobody remembers the story.
Start plan$299/month
Interviews, reviews, and conversations gathered and condensed into an answer to one question: why they bought, and why the others did not.
Why people pay for it
You change your offer based on hunches, because proper research takes weeks and nobody is doing it.
Grow plan$899/month
The old system inventoried, mapped to the new one, duplicates found, and workflows tested before the old system is switched off.
Why people pay for it
You have paid for the new system for six months and still use the old one, because nobody dares move the data.
Grow plan$899/month
Participants onboarded, reminded, tracked for progress, and whoever falls behind is contacted — so the coach can focus on coaching.
Why people pay for it
Half your cohort drops off in week three, and you only notice when the final session has five people in it.
Grow plan$899/month
Patient registration, appointment reminders, visit-note drafting, and post-treatment follow-up — running without adding front-desk staff.
Why people pay for it
Your doctor spends a third of their time typing notes, and no-shows are never called because nobody has time.
Start plan$299/month
Your happiest customers are identified from their behaviour, asked for a referral at the right moment, and the results tracked through to a deal.
Why people pay for it
Your best clients came from referrals, and you have never once asked for them systematically — only occasionally, when it happens to cross your mind.
Scale plan$2,499/month
A whole agency operation run for a single operator: prospect research, proposal writing, service delivery, and client reporting.
Why people pay for it
You can do the work yourself; you cannot do it for twelve clients at once — and that is exactly where your growth stops.
Grow plan$899/month
One place for your clients to see their own work status, documents, and invoices — without messaging to ask.
Why people pay for it
A third of the messages your team receives are "where are we with this?" — a question your systems already answer.
Grow plan$899/month
Lapsed patients contacted, recommended-but-untaken treatments followed up, and empty chair time filled.
Why people pay for it
Hundreds of patients came once and never returned, and nobody contacts them — while the chair sits empty every Tuesday afternoon.
Start plan$299/month
Several versions of your offer page and its headline are written, tested against traffic you already have, and the winner reported with the reason it won.
Why people pay for it
You pay for traffic, people arrive, then leave. You suspect the page is the problem, but you never have time to test another version.
Grow plan$899/month
The small tools your team needs, built in days — forms, dashboards, trackers, approvals — without queuing behind the IT backlog.
Why people pay for it
Your team runs daily operations from a spreadsheet one person has locked, and the request for a proper tool has been in the IT queue for eight months.
Grow plan$899/month
Suitable sponsors are found, packages shaped around what each of them cares about, proposals sent, and follow-up sustained right up to the event.
Why people pay for it
Your event is eight weeks out and the sponsor slots are still half empty, because chasing sponsors is a full-time job nobody is doing.
Start plan$299/month
The spreadsheet running part of your business turned into a real application — with permissions, change history, and no formulas anyone can delete.
Why people pay for it
Your operations depend on one file anyone can break with a single keystroke, and nobody knows who changed what.
Grow plan$899/month
New partners onboarded, given the materials they need, their activity watched, and whoever goes quiet contacted before they stop altogether.
Why people pay for it
You have thirty signed partners and only four have ever sent a single client. The rest signed up and were never heard from again.
Start plan$299/month
Scattered documents, procedures, and notes gathered into one place you can question in plain sentences — with every answer citing its source.
Why people pay for it
A new hire takes three months to become self-sufficient — not because the work is hard, but because nobody knows where the answers are kept.
Start plan$299/month
The old knowledge base moved across, outdated entries flagged, overlapping ones merged, and the structure rebuilt.
Why people pay for it
Your knowledge base holds four versions of the same procedure, all different, and nobody knows which one applies.
Grow plan$899/month
The written procedures you already have turned into agents that actually carry them out — with limits of authority and hand-over points.
Why people pay for it
You have a folder of neatly written procedures, and not one is followed exactly as written.
Start plan$299/month
Duplicate records merged, blanks filled from legitimate sources, stale entries flagged, then kept clean.
Why people pay for it
One company appears five times with different spellings, and your sales report counts it as five customers.
Start plan$299/month
Your team trained to use the agents already in place: what may be delegated, what must still be checked, and how to recognise a doubtful answer.
Why people pay for it
You have deployed AI tools, and half the team will not touch them while the other half trusts them blindly. Both are dangerous.
Start plan$299/month
Every running automation watched; failures reported, retried where possible, and escalated to a person where not.
Why people pay for it
Your automation stopped working three weeks ago and nobody noticed until a customer phoned.
We attack your systems first, before anyone else does.
An inexpensive first step, to confirm the problem before committing real money.
3 daysFree for one domain
An inventory of what of yours is visible from the internet, and which of it should not be.
Why people pay for it
Nobody knows for certain how many company services are exposed to the internet, let alone since when.
1–2 weeks$4,000
The gap between where you are and ISO 27001 or SOC 2, with a work list already prioritised.
Why people pay for it
A prospect wants certification, but nobody knows how far away it is or how long it takes.
The scope can be pinned down, so we publish the number along with its ceiling.
1–2 weeks$3,200
Testing whether an assistant can be coaxed into leaking data, exceeding its authority, or obeying instructions an outsider slipped in.
Why people pay for it
The assistant is deployed and wired to company data, but was never tested for hijacking through an ordinary message.
2 weeks$4,500
A real attacking test of the application, with a report you can hand to prospects, plus one retest.
Why people pay for it
A prospect is withholding signature until a penetration test report exists — the deal is stuck there.
2 weeks$3,800
Assessment and hardening of one AWS, Azure, or GCP environment, with monitoring afterwards.
Why people pay for it
Default settings were left as they came, and nobody knows whose permissions are far too broad.
2 weeks$3,800
A review of the corporate account directory: permissions, privileged accounts, and old accounts never disabled.
Why people pay for it
Accounts of staff who left a year ago are still active, and some hold full administrative rights.
2 weeks$3,800
Testing of the Android and iPhone apps, including the third-party libraries bundled inside them.
Why people pay for it
The app stores keys and data on the user’s device, and nobody has ever checked whether that can be prised open.
2–3 weeks$4,400
Testing AI-driven systems: instructions smuggled in through outside text, cross-user data leakage, agents talked past their authority, and costs an attacker can force upward.
Why people pay for it
You deployed an AI assistant that reads outside email, documents, or web pages. That outside text can contain instructions — and an assistant not built to tell data from commands will follow them, using the authority you granted it.
2 weeks$2,600
Reviewing AWS, GCP, or Azure configuration: open storage, over-broad permissions, keys never rotated, and audit logging that turns out to be switched off.
Why people pay for it
The largest breaches of recent years were not sophisticated intrusions but a single storage bucket set to public. Nobody attacked anything — the data was simply downloadable by anyone.
2–3 weeks$3,900
Android and iOS testing: on-device storage, keys embedded in the bundle, traffic interception, certificate pinning, and behaviour on a rooted or jailbroken device.
Why people pay for it
Tens of thousands of people have installed your app and it stores something on their device. Anyone can download the bundle, open it, and read what was left inside — without touching your servers at all.
3 weeks$1,900
A phishing campaign written to look like your company’s real correspondence, followed by short training for those who fell for it — not an annual lecture for everyone.
Why people pay for it
Everyone agrees that "people are the weakest link", yet nobody knows what percentage of your team would actually click. Without that number, the security budget always loses to budgets that have one.
2–3 weeks$3,400
Hands-on testing of your web application: account takeover, cross-user authorisation flaws, injection, malicious upload, and payment flows. Not a scanner report pasted into a document.
Why people pay for it
A large client or an investor wants a security test report before signing, and you do not have one. What you have is an automated scan they rejected because no human tester stood behind it.
3 weeks$4,200
A full review against Indonesia’s personal data protection obligations: lawful basis, access audit trails, retention limits, data-subject request routes, and the 72-hour breach notification procedure.
Why people pay for it
The law allows administrative sanctions of up to 2% of annual revenue, and a breach must be reported within 72 hours. If the procedure is written while the breach is unfolding, the deadline passes before the first meeting ends.
2 weeks$2,900
Endpoint-level testing: object-level authorisation, identifier enumeration, rate limiting, data leaking in responses, and keys that reach further than they should.
Why people pay for it
Your API serves partners and a mobile app but has never been tested apart from the interface. Authorisation flaws there are invisible from the screen — and that is exactly where customer records get pulled one by one without looking suspicious.
3 weeks$3,600
Building the detection, assessment, and reporting path so a 24-hour regulator deadline can actually be met — including who decides, what is reported, and who signs.
Why people pay for it
Since 1 March 2026, IT incidents must be reported to the financial regulator within 24 hours of discovery. That deadline lands while everyone is busy containing the incident — if the process does not exist beforehand, it will not be written during.
Scope is established first through diagnosis. Quoting before that guarantees one side loses.
Minimum 3 days$750/day
Containment so it stops spreading, forensics on what was actually taken, and drafting the mandatory 72-hour report.
Why people pay for it
The breach has happened, the 72-hour reporting clock is running, and fines can reach two per cent of annual revenue.
3–6 weeks
An inventory of third-party components, flags on the vulnerable ones, and scanning of code and secrets before production.
Why people pay for it
Most of the application is other people’s components, and no list exists of what is actually inside.
Diagnosis first
An attack resembling a real adversary, unannounced to the internal team, to test detection and response.
Why people pay for it
Detection tools are bought and procedures written, but nobody knows whether either actually works.
3–9 months
Support through to ISO 27001, SOC 2, or PCI-DSS, including preparing the evidence auditors ask for.
Why people pay for it
Certification is required by a client or regulator, and every delay means a deal held up longer.
3–5 weeks
Reading the source on the paths that matter — login, authorisation, money, and uploads — plus a review of the third-party libraries that ship to production with it.
Why people pay for it
Outside testing only finds what is reachable from outside. An authorisation flaw that opens only on a specific role combination, and a third-party library republished with malicious code, are both invisible from there.
2–6 weeks
Establishing what actually happened: how they got in, how far they went, what data was touched, and whether they are still inside.
Why people pay for it
You know you were breached but not what was taken — and the first question from the regulator, your clients, and the press all demand that answer. Saying "we are still investigating" for a week damages trust more than the breach did.
4–8 months
Bringing an information security management system to the point where a certification body can audit it: scope, risk assessment, policies, evidence of operation, and internal audit.
Why people pay for it
Government tenders and enterprise clients require a valid ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate. Without it your bid is dropped at the administrative stage — before a single person reads the technical proposal.
3–4 weeks
Simulating an attacker already inside your network — from one employee laptop, how far they can move, escalate, and reach core systems.
Why people pay for it
Your defences face outward. If one employee laptop falls to a phishing email, nobody knows how far an attacker can walk inside — and the answer is usually much further than anyone assumed.
For systems already live that need someone accountable.
Monthly$2,200/month
A few days a month setting priorities, answering prospects’ security questionnaires, and sitting through audits.
Why people pay for it
Nobody owns security until something happens — and a full-time hire is not yet justifiable.
Ongoing$3,200/month
A security lead present a few days a month: setting the plan, answering client and regulator questionnaires, leading during incidents, and blocking decisions that will hurt a year from now.
Why people pay for it
You need someone accountable for security but are not yet big enough for a full-time CISO. So security decisions fall to whoever is free that week — and client questionnaires get answered with guesses.
Monthly$1,400/month
Written procedures, escalation paths, and a quarterly tabletop exercise so the first incident is not met with panic.
Why people pay for it
If it happened tonight, nobody knows who to call first or who has the authority to decide.
Monthly, six-month minimum$1,100/month
A monthly recurring assessment with period-on-period comparison: what improved, what is new.
Why people pay for it
Testing once a year means the other eleven months pass with nobody knowing the state of things.
Ongoing$1,800/month
A number to call when things go wrong, staffed by people who already know your architecture — not a team starting to read while the first hour burns.
Why people pay for it
When you are attacked, the first hour decides everything — and that hour is spent finding someone to help and explaining your architecture from scratch. The regulator wants a report in 24 hours; you do not yet know what happened.
The published figures are full prices with a written scope, not a "starting from". Services without a figure are not more expensive — their scope genuinely cannot be pinned down before a diagnosis, and quoting before that guarantees one side loses.
Cross packages
The four areas above are usually sold by four different kinds of firm. What is rare is not any one of them — it is having them in a single team.
The application is built, then penetration-tested by the same team before handover.
Why it is rare
Builders usually have no testers; testers usually do not know how the system was built.
The agent ships with its limits of authority, then is tested against instructions slipped in by outsiders.
Why it is rare
Almost every AI vendor deploys agents without ever testing whether they can be hijacked.
The contract is audited before launch, not after the funds are gone.
Why it is rare
Contract developers can rarely audit their own work honestly.
The on-chain and business sides connected: investor portal, issuer console, and reporting.
Why it is rare
Usually the two end up as separate systems that never speak.
Where to start
If any of these sounds like your organisation, that is the cheapest place to begin.
The same data retyped into several systems every day. The hours are measurable, and usually surprising.
You do not know a gap exists until someone finds it first — and it is rarely someone friendly.
Sales in one app, stock in another, notes in a chat group. No single screen anyone trusts.
When one person takes leave, the process stops. That is not a process, it is a habit.
Messages pile up at peak hours. Anything unanswered for ten minutes often goes elsewhere.
Every small request takes weeks, or the original vendor can no longer be reached.
Describe the problem. We will map it to the right service, and say plainly if it is not worth building yet.